↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Paracetamol, NSAIDS and opioid analgesics for chronic low back pain: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Paracetamol, NSAIDS and opioid analgesics for chronic low back pain: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013045
Authors

Matthew K Bagg, Andrew J McLachlan, Christopher G Maher, Steven J Kamper, Christopher M Williams, Nicholas Henschke, Benedict M Wand, G L Moseley, Markus Hübscher, Neil E O'Connell, Maurits W van Tulder, Adriani Nikolakopoulou, James H McAuley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Psychology 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 28 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,902,270
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,449
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,041
of 345,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.