↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011680.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille Hua, Romain Bosc, Emilie Sbidian, Nicolas De Prost, Carolyn Hughes, Patricia Jabre, Olivier Chosidow, Laurence Le Cleach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 379 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 15%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Other 32 8%
Researcher 31 8%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Other 70 18%
Unknown 117 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 36 9%
Unknown 136 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,792,145
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,449
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,155
of 347,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.