| Title |
Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011680.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camille Hua, Romain Bosc, Emilie Sbidian, Nicolas De Prost, Carolyn Hughes, Patricia Jabre, Olivier Chosidow, Laurence Le Cleach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 369 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Researcher | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 18% |
| Unknown | 115 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 133 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,792,145
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,449
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,155
of 347,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.