Title |
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for schizophrenia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006081.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nadine Dougall, Nicola Maayan, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Lisa M McDermott, Andrew McIntosh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 28% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
Egypt | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Guinea | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
Scientists | 8 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 326 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 11% |
Researcher | 28 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
Other | 55 | 17% |
Unknown | 92 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 22% |
Psychology | 52 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 26 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
Other | 32 | 10% |
Unknown | 109 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,530,874
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,251
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,601
of 278,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.