↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for chronic non‐hypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for chronic non‐hypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010965.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evi V Nagler, Maria C Haller, Wim Van Biesen, Raymond Vanholder, Jonathan C Craig, Angela C Webster

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 277 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Master 32 12%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 117 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 129 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,733,648
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,288
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,481
of 346,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.