↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
Title
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004464.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed A Thaha, Amin A Abukar, Noel N Thin, Anthony Ramsanahie, Charles H Knowles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 310 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 13%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 106 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 10%
Neuroscience 13 4%
Psychology 10 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 114 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,623,109
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,235
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,566
of 278,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.