RT @Faussenurse: You are completely right. Your own personal n=1 experience definitely outweighs any @cochranecollab reviews. Systematic re…
Lost count of how many probably they used in this.
Thx @JoyHataley I agree we need everyone practicing to full scope to improve access to Primary Care. As the Cochrane Library states reviewing 18 RCT's on NP vs. Family Doc care "Patient satisfaction is probably slightly higher in nurse‐led primary care"
RT @Faussenurse: You know, despite all the bruised egos, misleading statements, and noise, @adriandix was right. The latest @cochranecollab…
@thief14558441 @132_dc @Pablo_ide_rea25 @mon_caillou @FxLegrand https://t.co/dRexi9ngwE En français. Il y a plein d’autres études de cette nature.
RT @Faussenurse: You know, despite all the bruised egos, misleading statements, and noise, @adriandix was right. The latest @cochranecollab…
RT @Faussenurse: You know, despite all the bruised egos, misleading statements, and noise, @adriandix was right. The latest @cochranecollab…
RT @ComVousDites: Intéressant. D'après une "systematic review" de Cochrane les infirmières diplômées fourniraient des soins de meilleure qu…
RT @ComVousDites: Intéressant. D'après une "systematic review" de Cochrane les infirmières diplômées fourniraient des soins de meilleure qu…
Must read ⤵️⤵️⤵️
Intéressant. D'après une "systematic review" de Cochrane les infirmières diplômées fourniraient des soins de meilleure qualité que les médecins pour un certain nombre de problème de santé chronique. Je me demande à quel point les notions d'empathie et d'éc
RT @Faussenurse: You know, despite all the bruised egos, misleading statements, and noise, @adriandix was right. The latest @cochranecollab…
You know, despite all the bruised egos, misleading statements, and noise, @adriandix was right. The latest @cochranecollab systematic review (https://t.co/H9O3suUe07 ) concluded exactly that. @timescolonist @PennyDaflos @DoctorsOfBC @nnp_bc. https://t.co/V
You are completely right. Your own personal n=1 experience definitely outweighs any @cochranecollab reviews. Systematic reviews are overrated anyway. It’s so good to see a decade-long training centred on EBP at work… https://t.co/H9O3suUe07
RT @Faussenurse: Well… that escalated quickly. But you know why @DoctorsOfBC is so eager to state that “Nurse practitioners cannot replace…
RT @Faussenurse: Well… that escalated quickly. But you know why @DoctorsOfBC is so eager to state that “Nurse practitioners cannot replace…
RT @Faussenurse: Well… that escalated quickly. But you know why @DoctorsOfBC is so eager to state that “Nurse practitioners cannot replace…
RT @Faussenurse: Well… that escalated quickly. But you know why @DoctorsOfBC is so eager to state that “Nurse practitioners cannot replace…
RT @Faussenurse: Well… that escalated quickly. But you know why @DoctorsOfBC is so eager to state that “Nurse practitioners cannot replace…
Well… that escalated quickly. But you know why @DoctorsOfBC is so eager to state that “Nurse practitioners cannot replace doctors” right? @KatharineSmart It’s because the evidence suggests they mostly can. https://t.co/H9O3suUe07
@EdN618 @AnnCoulter Not always the case. NPs have years of experience as nurses before they go to NP school. Plus, the courses many doctors have to take don’t prepare them at all for having a nose for an accurate diagnosis. Cochrane review of the evidence
RT @AndreFringer: Wir sind stolz, weil Pflege systemrelevant ist (Bild 15, KW 14). #MScNZHAW #Pflegestolz #ZHAW @sbkasi Nachzulesen u. a.…
Wir sind stolz, weil Pflege systemrelevant ist (Bild 15, KW 14). #MScNZHAW #Pflegestolz #ZHAW @sbkasi Nachzulesen u. a. hier: - https://t.co/fYoreJVU7O - https://t.co/kqZSbwCrfo https://t.co/moM87yqvmB
@JnMitchum @baroulot @drdiprapi @DevictorJulie @QandilB @barriere_dr Low cost ?! https://t.co/r99rIkLU4u Instruisez vous et puis, sérieusement, ne parlez pas de ce que vous maîtrisez pas ça devient indécent, decridibilisant par rapport à vos confrères qui
@Fioco0 @4heuresdeux Pour la perte de qualité pour les patients, je vous invite à une revue de littérature https://t.co/r99rIkLU4u
@tki_ojo @KarinaJoaoDoSa1 @cesm_sindicatos Pues yo sigo pensando que un nivel es el de las opiniones y otro el de la evidencia. Que la Cochrane seguro q se ha pasado por el forro el conflicto d intereses, pero bueno, vamos a darle un voto de confianza: htt
@tki_ojo @KarinaJoaoDoSa1 @cesm_sindicatos Pero de verdad, ¿q es eso de “literatura promovida por enferneria”? Ahí tiene, la Cochrane, q no sé por quién está promovida, pero cuando se trata de ciencia y evidencia, quien lo “promueva” a mí me da igual. ht
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
@francklegrand @harmendil Comme si la médecine était la seule finalité pour apporter du soin aux patients. Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7). https://t.co/UwQtrG0z27
RT @ragou37: @Gespairs @stephanie_rist @ordre_medecins Au contraire on commence à savoir exactement Laurant, M., Biezen, M. van der, Wijers…
RT @bernadettepb1: Les IPA ont déjà fait la preuve à l'étranger de leur bénéfice dans les parcours de soins des patients. Evidence-based-nu…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
@Gespairs @stephanie_rist @ordre_medecins Au contraire on commence à savoir exactement Laurant, M., Biezen, M. van der, Wijers, N., Watananirun, K., Kontopantelis, E. et Vught, A. J. van. (2018). Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care. Cochrane
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @bernadettepb1: Les IPA ont déjà fait la preuve à l'étranger de leur bénéfice dans les parcours de soins des patients. Evidence-based-nu…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @bernadettepb1: Les IPA ont déjà fait la preuve à l'étranger de leur bénéfice dans les parcours de soins des patients. Evidence-based-nu…
RT @bernadettepb1: Les IPA ont déjà fait la preuve à l'étranger de leur bénéfice dans les parcours de soins des patients. Evidence-based-nu…
RT @bernadettepb1: Les IPA ont déjà fait la preuve à l'étranger de leur bénéfice dans les parcours de soins des patients. Evidence-based-nu…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @CHU4life: @ordre_medecins vous avez le melon au point de vous penser plus compétents que @CochraneFrance ?
@ordre_medecins vous avez le melon au point de vous penser plus compétents que @CochraneFrance ?
Les IPA ont déjà fait la preuve à l'étranger de leur bénéfice dans les parcours de soins des patients. Evidence-based-nursing ! #IPActions @olivierveran @EmmanuelMacron @Senat
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
RT @DevictorJulie: https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such…
https://t.co/lcFj1qh8mT «For some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses,such as nurse practitioners, practice nurses, and registered nurses,probably provide equal or possibly even better quality of care compared
RT @ragou37: @fredericbizard @LaurentLantieri Cher monsieur parier sur les justes compétences des paramédicaux qui se forment en outre pour…
@fredericbizard @LaurentLantieri Cher monsieur parier sur les justes compétences des paramédicaux qui se forment en outre pour n’est pas une détérioration puisque le médecin reste le coordinateur de parcours. Je vous invite à regarder cette revue de littér
@MG_France @EmmanuelMacron @JeanCASTEX @olivierveran @AssembleeNat @Senat Et voilà MGFrance arrive en Menaçant les usagers et le système de santé ! Il y a des publications sur l’intérêt https://t.co/DeDeamywyS ça suffit #IPActions @UNIPA9 @CnpIpa @anfipa1
@jeroniamiralles @DrMiguelLazaro @SimebalCesm @faecap @Coiba1 @asociacionABIC @apmallorca @Patgompic @SATSE_Baleares @AIFICC Ni caso, los datos avalan la necesidad y pertinencia de la enfermera comunitaria. No amplifiquéis este mensaje errado https://t.co/
@DocStrange_1 @writesolution RTFA, as they say: https://t.co/GMWmvXfBgH https://t.co/LCM6FvCoF7
@DrCDav Yes, different training and pay, but outcomes? Historical rather than actual differences? "...care delivered by nurses, compared to care delivered by doctors, probably generates similar or better health outcomes for a broad range of patient condit
@Rachel_Prusak @AANP_NEWS @OregonNurses Also, NP naysayer physicians claim to be evidence-based, yet ignore > 40 years of evidence that NPs in primary care show as good if not better quality and outcomes, and better pt. satisfaction, than physicians! @A
@MidlevelCare @LoACoo Problems exists in all industries - but evidence is overwhelming that NPs provide high quality, safe care: https://t.co/w7BCENPIPj Derisive labels shift the focus from what matters—improving HC access for all by working together &
@nikillinit There are quite a few studies on #3. To the best of my knowledge, none of them supports the physician lobbying perspective, at least with respect to typical primary care scenarios. Example: https://t.co/lDTuGBEb4w
@francklegrand @AbdoKhoury00 @YordaYou @wargonm @AMUFAMUF1 Pourtant les études et meta analyses montrent que ce n’est pas de la médecine à 2 vitesse d’avoir de IPA qui diagnostiquent traitent des patho communautaires en 1ère intention aussi bien que des mé
A review of 18 RCTs (all from high-income countries bar one in a middle-income nation) found no benefits to having primary care from physicians rather than nurses. Outside of basket cases like Nigeria, primary care from doctors doesn't seem to do much http
@AverbeckHeiner Das Cochrane review dazu ist von 2018: https://t.co/bXiSNOO9p4 Es ist noch nicht ganz durch aber wesentlich weiter als in Deutschland. Und wesentlich weniger festgefahren.
@hands4catching So disappointing. Would love to see the methods of the survey and tools they cite in the press release because at least two cochrane reviews tells a different story 1) https://t.co/30ER8L2xf5 2) https://t.co/Ch5L0kwFqZ
@brookmanknight What evidence you looking at? This Cochrane review suggests otherwise- fewer deaths https://t.co/cYwSbZAauH problem of funding for nurse led care is a political issue not clinical outcome
RT @CochraneLibrary: Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care | Updated #CochraneEvidence: https://t.co/PpmodkOE1y #blogshot #prim…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care | Updated #CochraneEvidence: https://t.co/PpmodkOE1y #blogshot #prim…
RT @Ibra_balharith: في دراسة حديثة .. التمريض بدلاً مِن الاطباء في الرعاية الصحية الأولية حيث قدمت استنتاجاً ان التمريض قد يكون (مساوي او ا…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care | Updated #CochraneEvidence: https://t.co/PpmodkOE1y #blogshot #prim…
@CM_Whaley @MartinSGaynor @stuartcraig @JoanneSpetz @biancafrogner @ullimuench There are at least 4 meta-analyses on the quality & cost of NPs vs MDs, and this bill was studied in depth by a UCSF team, which proj lower costs. The AMA is cherry-picking
RT @parsonshanged: #nursetwitter this MD is attacking our profession and making wild claims questioning the safety of primary care provided…
@HalstedMD Is this one mans war with reality? You think Cochrane Review is involved in a secret plot to undermine patient care? 18 CRT’s not enough evidence for you? https://t.co/05GlZfJCgh
@HalstedMD Here’s a summary of the evidence by Cochrane Review about the safety and satisfaction Np’s provide patients: https://t.co/05GlZfJCgh
#nursetwitter this MD is attacking our profession and making wild claims questioning the safety of primary care provided by NP’s. Here’s a meta analysis of 18 studies by Cochrane summarizing the evidence: https://t.co/05GlZfJCgh
@Gaujot There are at least four systematic reviews of the literature on that question (and dozens of underlying studies), conducted over the course of 20+ years, in multiple countries. There’s no lack of research, just motivated reasoning by MD groups. Ex
@rshawnm @lisabari @aafp If it is useful, here are four systematic reviews that I am aware of, from 2002, 2005, 2015 and 2018: https://t.co/CXWN84gCzC https://t.co/SOQfEaX3av https://t.co/AL0Xiyc0Eq https://t.co/lDTuGBEb4w
@Ann_Nonymous_MD @FeibiZheng @LeahHoustonMD To be clear, I was citing one study among hundreds of this type (the first that showed up on google), but agree that many are low quality. Here is a good lit review that gives more weight to the better studies: h
@RBlockMD @JoTBizMD @ajoykumarmd EBP shows no significant difference in outcomes between NPs and MDs in primary care. I’m well aware of the limitations of my training. I’d love if everyone had access to an MD as a PCP. They don’t. NPs and PAs are filling t
RT @SACochrane: On International Nurses Day 2020 we salute the vital role that nurses play. Cochrane has done a number of reviews on the ch…
On International Nurses Day 2020 we salute the vital role that nurses play. Cochrane has done a number of reviews on the challenges & advantages of task shifting from doctors to nurses. https://t.co/z3eO8q7uQd https://t.co/dLBEgnAoSl https://t.co/gi7
RT @pppforpatients: Another look at “those studies” that some point to in support of independent practice for NPs. Hint: they don’t show…
Another look at “those studies” that some point to in support of independent practice for NPs. Hint: they don’t show what the NPs claim they show. @threadreaderapp unroll
See 18 studies here: https://t.co/6ghpNTSZSn
@twankenhaus Das Review: https://t.co/lMcazJyAqU
@rjunkiedoc @DocStrange_1 @fpapro1 @pppforpatients Cochrane review: https://t.co/VYGc8LdOKf
@DocStrange_1 @KTJanePA @PAubatron @drjohnm What about this do you not understand? https://t.co/lCatemyEx4 Delivery of primary healthcare services by nurses instead of doctors probably leads to similar or better patient health and higher patient satisfacti
Wenn das bei uns im Gesundheitssystem mal ankommen und umgesetzt würde. #YearoftheNurse #respectnurses