↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of anxiety disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of anxiety disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008483.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zafar A Usmani, Kristin V Carson, Jien N Cheng, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterised by inflammation of the airways and destruction of pulmonary tissue with post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC of <0.70 (forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity). Evidence indicates an increased prevalence of anxiety disorders in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as compared with the general population and persons suffering from many other chronic illnesses. Anxiety in people with COPD has been shown to increase disability and impair functional status, resulting in an overall reduction in quality of life. As such, pharmacological interventions are commonly used to treat anxiety disorders in patients with COPD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 44 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 36%
Psychology 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 50 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,229,998
of 21,329,785 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,218
of 12,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,860
of 133,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,329,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.