| Title |
Interventions for prevention of drug use by young people delivered in non‐school settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005030.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Gates, Jim McCambridge, Lesley A Smith, David Foxcroft |
| Abstract |
Interventions intended to prevent or reduce use of drugs by young people may be delivered in schools or in other settings. This review aims to summarise the current literature about the effectiveness of interventions delivered in non schools settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 298 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 23% |
| Unknown | 62 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 14% |
| Psychology | 42 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 74 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,759,989
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,099
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,121
of 172,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.