↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged students

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
72 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged students
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004676.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Betsy Kristjansson, Mark Petticrew, Barbara MacDonald, Julia Krasevec, Laura Janzen, Trish Greenhalgh, George A Wells, Jessie MacGowan, Anna P Farmer, Beverley Shea, Alain Mayhew, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch

Abstract

Early malnutrition and/or micronutrient deficiencies can adversely affect physical, mental, and social aspects of child health. School feeding programs are designed to improve attendance, achievement, growth, and other health outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 406 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 17%
Researcher 64 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Other 24 6%
Other 73 18%
Unknown 98 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 22%
Social Sciences 58 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20 5%
Other 57 14%
Unknown 113 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#257,500
of 22,554,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#429
of 12,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#524
of 152,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,554,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.