| Title |
Chinese herbal medicines for hypothyroidism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008779.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lin-qiu Ke, Ying Hu, Kun Yang, Nanwei Tong |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,655,556
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,511
of 12,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,189
of 357,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.