↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000270.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren Malone, Sarah V L Marriott, Giles Newton-Howes, Shaeda Simmonds, Peter Tyrer

Abstract

Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings, underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 29%
Psychology 43 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 12%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 42 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,276,289
of 16,888,555 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,981
of 11,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,928
of 94,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,888,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.