↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000270.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren Malone, Sarah V L Marriott, Giles Newton-Howes, Shaeda Simmonds, Peter Tyrer

Abstract

Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings, underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 28%
Psychology 47 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 13%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 59 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,550,961
of 21,693,385 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,440
of 12,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,155
of 105,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,693,385 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.