↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High‐dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell rescue for children with high‐risk neuroblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
High‐dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell rescue for children with high‐risk neuroblastoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006301.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bilgehan Yalçin, Leontien CM Kremer, Elvira C van Dalen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 18 8%
Researcher 18 8%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 78 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Psychology 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 85 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,162,707
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,506
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,347
of 293,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.