↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003642.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Mei Zhang, Weiya Wang, Sameline Grimsgaard

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 220 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 48 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 54 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,793,380
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,016
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,747
of 44,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.