↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003642.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Mei Zhang, Weiya Wang, Sameline Grimsgaard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Master 32 13%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 51 21%
Unknown 59 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,098,058
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,406
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,046
of 47,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.