The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000567.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon R Lewis, Michael W Pritchard, David JW Evans, Andrew R Butler, Phil Alderson, Andrew F Smith, Ian Roberts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Algeria | 1 | 4% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
| Maldives | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 913 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 903 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 118 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 99 | 11% |
| Other | 91 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 72 | 8% |
| Researcher | 56 | 6% |
| Other | 169 | 19% |
| Unknown | 308 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 359 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 85 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 34 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 76 | 8% |
| Unknown | 330 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,166,503
of 26,466,900 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,207
of 13,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,230
of 344,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,466,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.