↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
Title
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003130.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie N Hofstede, Klaas Auke Nouta, Wilco Jacobs, Miranda L van Hooff, Ate B Wymenga, Bart G Pijls, Rob GHH Nelissen, Perla J Marang‐van de Mheen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Other 19 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 79 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 11%
Psychology 15 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 97 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,850,931
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,772
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,748
of 364,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.