↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003130.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie N Hofstede, Klaas Auke Nouta, Wilco Jacobs, Miranda L van Hooff, Ate B Wymenga, Bart G Pijls, Rob GHH Nelissen, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 16%
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 50 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Psychology 13 5%
Engineering 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 62 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,176,444
of 19,001,205 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,399
of 11,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,360
of 291,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,001,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.