| Title |
Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005292.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Ping Liu, Hong Yang, Yun Xia, Francesco Cardini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 18% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,969,003
of 24,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,743
of 12,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,415
of 195,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.