↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005292.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Hong Yang, Yun Xia, Francesco Cardini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 237 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 18%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Master 23 10%
Other 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 72 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 80 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,969,003
of 24,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,743
of 12,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,415
of 195,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.