↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005292.pub3
Pubmed ID
23633329
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Hong Yang, Yun Xia, Francesco Cardini

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 18%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Master 22 10%
Other 16 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 61 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 67 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,705,901
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,385
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,588
of 192,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.