↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005292.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Hong Yang, Yun Xia, Francesco Cardini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 252 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 17%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Master 24 9%
Other 18 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 80 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 90 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,225,848
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,868
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,997
of 205,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.