The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graham Howarth, Danie J Botha |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,027,654
of 26,442,002 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,622
of 13,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,730
of 41,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,442,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.