↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corticosteroids for the common cold

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Corticosteroids for the common cold
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008116.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gail Hayward, Matthew J Thompson, Rafael Perera, Chris B Del Mar, Paul P Glasziou, Carl J Heneghan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 226 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Master 28 12%
Other 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 80 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 92 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2024.
All research outputs
#294,053
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#472
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,871
of 292,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.