↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Force platform feedback for standing balance training after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Force platform feedback for standing balance training after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004129.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay-Goddard, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Michael Moffatt, Shayne P Taback

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 17%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 20%
Engineering 17 10%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 37 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,294,248
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,996
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,550
of 62,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.