↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese medicinal herbs for measles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Chinese medicinal herbs for measles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005531.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shou Chen, Taixiang Wu, Xiangyu Kong, Hao Yuan

Abstract

Measles is an infectious disease caused by the Morbillivirus. Chinese physicians believe that medicinal herbs are effective in alleviating symptoms and preventing complications. Chinese herbal medicines are dispensed according to the particular symptoms. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Other 10 13%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,954,592
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,769
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,163
of 142,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.