↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
Title
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010403.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Kloukos, Piotr Fudalej, Patrick Sequeira‐Byron, Christos Katsaros

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 379 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 145 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Psychology 20 5%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 162 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,537,513
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,312
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,326
of 341,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.