↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Overdiagnosis due to screening mammography for women aged 40 years and over

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Overdiagnosis due to screening mammography for women aged 40 years and over
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013076
Authors

Gemma Jacklyn, Kevin McGeechan, Nehmat Houssami, Katy Bell, Paul P Glasziou, Alexandra Barratt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,270,617
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,891
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,653
of 345,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.