↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011298.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lopez, Laureen M, Grey, Thomas W, Chen, Mario, Hiller, Janet E, Laureen M Lopez, Thomas W Grey, Mario Chen, Janet E Hiller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 318 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 18%
Researcher 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Postgraduate 24 7%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 81 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 17%
Social Sciences 28 9%
Psychology 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 91 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,741,801
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,214
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,099
of 365,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.