↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies

Overview of attention for article published in this source, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011298.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lopez, Laureen M, Grey, Thomas W, Chen, Mario, Hiller, Janet E

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 239 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 19%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 61 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 16%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Psychology 12 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 70 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,421,645
of 17,625,695 outputs
Outputs from this source
#6,041
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,853
of 291,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#180
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,625,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.