| Title |
Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011298.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lopez, Laureen M, Grey, Thomas W, Chen, Mario, Hiller, Janet E, Laureen M Lopez, Thomas W Grey, Mario Chen, Janet E Hiller |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 17% |
| Researcher | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 87 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 97 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,741,801
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,214
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,099
of 365,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.