↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic neuropathic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic neuropathic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011259.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Eccleston, Leslie Hearn, Amanda C de C Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 338 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Researcher 30 9%
Other 16 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 108 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 24%
Psychology 46 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 12%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 118 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,223,040
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,521
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,908
of 296,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.