↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS) in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS) in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012798.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Green, Will Carroll, Francis J Gilchrist

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,975,602
of 26,383,299 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,042
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,443
of 345,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.