↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nir Haya, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann-Schmid, Christopher Maher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 13 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 67 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 17%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 77 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,725,724
of 16,536,729 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,812
of 11,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,674
of 279,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,536,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.