↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nir Haya, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann‐Schmid, Christopher Maher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 349 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 14%
Student > Master 43 12%
Researcher 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Other 20 6%
Other 65 19%
Unknown 127 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 15%
Unspecified 12 3%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 143 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,541,990
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,813
of 11,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,698
of 342,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.