↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nir Haya, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann‐Schmid, Christopher Maher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 337 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Student > Master 43 13%
Researcher 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Other 19 6%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 133 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 14%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 148 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,921,638
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,777
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,982
of 342,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.