| Title |
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nir Haya, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann‐Schmid, Christopher Maher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 336 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 136 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 151 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,604,954
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,621
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,331
of 343,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.