↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Financial interventions and movement restrictions for managing the movement of health workers between public and private organizations in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Financial interventions and movement restrictions for managing the movement of health workers between public and private organizations in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009845.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Alison A Kinengyere, Freddie Ssengooba, George W Pariyo, Suzanne N Kiwanuka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 20%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Social Sciences 25 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 5%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 63 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,096,879
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,691
of 12,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,964
of 323,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#187
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.