↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electromechanical and robot‐assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
700 Mendeley
Title
Electromechanical and robot‐assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Mehrholz, Marcus Pohl, Thomas Platz, Joachim Kugler, Bernhard Elsner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 700 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 696 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 14%
Student > Bachelor 76 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 10%
Researcher 64 9%
Other 43 6%
Other 118 17%
Unknown 231 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 98 14%
Engineering 92 13%
Neuroscience 45 6%
Sports and Recreations 19 3%
Other 79 11%
Unknown 263 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,987,692
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,101
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,462
of 348,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.