↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Epidural analgesia versus patient‐controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra‐abdominal surgery in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
411 Mendeley
Title
Epidural analgesia versus patient‐controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra‐abdominal surgery in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010434.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon H Salicath, Emily CY Yeoh, Michael H Bennett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 411 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 13%
Student > Master 46 11%
Other 33 8%
Researcher 27 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 160 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 9%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 41 10%
Unknown 175 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,121,044
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,443
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,927
of 344,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.