↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010434.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon H Salicath, Emily CY Yeoh, Michael H Bennett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 260 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Master 35 13%
Researcher 25 10%
Other 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 73 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 12%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 82 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,902,100
of 18,934,527 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,447
of 11,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,634
of 286,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,934,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.