The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Treatment for superficial infusion thrombophlebitis of the upper extremity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011015.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcello Di Nisio, Frank Peinemann, Ettore Porreca, Anne WS Rutjes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,824,730
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,737
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,517
of 396,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.