The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008803.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuele Michelessi, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Francesco Oddone, Miriam Brazzelli, Mariacristina Parravano, Sara Franchi, Sueko M Ng, Gianni Virgili |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 316 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
| Researcher | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 21% |
| Unknown | 101 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 109 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,518,937
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,919
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,133
of 398,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.