↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008691.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louis W Wang, Magid A Fahim, Andrew Hayen, Ruth L Mitchell, Laura Baines, Stephen Lord, Jonathan C Craig, Angela C Webster

Abstract

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and adverse cardiac events. Screening for CAD is therefore an important part of preoperative evaluation for kidney transplant candidates. There is significant interest in the role of non-invasive cardiac investigations and their ability to identify patients at high risk of CAD. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 20%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 36 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,987,084
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,649
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,185
of 221,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.