↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008691.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louis W Wang, Magid A Fahim, Andrew Hayen, Ruth L Mitchell, Laura Baines, Stephen Lord, Jonathan C Craig, Angela C Webster

Abstract

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and adverse cardiac events. Screening for CAD is therefore an important part of preoperative evaluation for kidney transplant candidates. There is significant interest in the role of non-invasive cardiac investigations and their ability to identify patients at high risk of CAD. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 232 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Other 20 8%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 51 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Psychology 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 58 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,682,495
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,362
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,433
of 240,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.