| Title |
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000015.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William D Fraser, Lucile Turcot, Isabelle Krauss, Gisèle Brisson-Carrol |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2009.
All research outputs
#7,576,264
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,026
of 12,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,006
of 66,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.