The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Electrical stimulation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003687 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucie Pelland, Lucie Brosseau, Lynn Casimiro, Vivian Welch, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 163 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
Researcher | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 18% |
Unknown | 50 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 61 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,850,931
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,772
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,492
of 128,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.