↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrical stimulation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Electrical stimulation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003687
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucie Pelland, Lucie Brosseau, Lynn Casimiro, Vivian Welch, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 61 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,850,931
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,772
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,492
of 128,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.