↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrical stimulation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Electrical stimulation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003687
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucie Pelland, Lucie Brosseau, Lynn Casimiro, Vivian Welch, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 12 8%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 50 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,576,264
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,026
of 12,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,095
of 121,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.