| Title |
Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009228.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel M Galvagno, Robert Sikorski, Jon M Hirshon, Douglas Floccare, Christopher Stephens, Deirdre Beecher, Stephen Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 229 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% |
| Australia | 15 | 7% |
| Canada | 11 | 5% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Denmark | 3 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 125 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 174 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 11% |
| Scientists | 23 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 17% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 20% |
| Unknown | 98 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#373,000
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#634
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,006
of 398,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.