↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amiodarone versus other pharmacological interventions for prevention of sudden cardiac death

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Amiodarone versus other pharmacological interventions for prevention of sudden cardiac death
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008093.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Carlos Claro, Roberto Candia, Gabriel Rada, Fernando Baraona, Francisco Larrondo, Luz M Letelier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 52 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,288,173
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,704
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,755
of 397,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.