↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma

Overview of attention for article published in this source, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
Title
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006672.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aasheim, Vigdis, Nilsen, Anne Britt Vika, Lukasse, Mirjam, Reinar, Liv Merete

Abstract

Most vaginal births are associated with some form of trauma to the genital tract. The morbidity associated with perineal trauma is significant, especially when it comes to third- and fourth-degree tears. Different perineal techniques and interventions are being used to prevent perineal trauma. These interventions include perineal massage, warm compresses and perineal management techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 322 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 19%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 33 10%
Other 30 9%
Researcher 22 7%
Other 86 26%
Unknown 68 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 21%
Unspecified 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 74 22%