| Title |
Interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in children with HIV infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009513 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Bain‐Brickley, Lisa M Butler, Gail E Kennedy, George W Rutherford |
| Abstract |
Achieving and maintaining high levels of medication adherence are required to achieve the full benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART), yet suboptimal adherence among children is common in both developed and developing countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 469 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 112 | 23% |
| Researcher | 70 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 82 | 17% |
| Unknown | 109 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 8% |
| Psychology | 25 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 12% |
| Unknown | 120 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,771,828
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,396
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,908
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.