The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Fluoride supplements (tablets, drops, lozenges or chewing gums) for preventing dental caries in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007592.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stéphanie Tubert‐Jeannin, Candy Auclair, Emmanuel Amsallem, Paul Tramini, Laurent Gerbaud, Christiane Ruffieux, Andreas G Schulte, Martin J Koch, Myriam Rège‐Walther, Amid Ismail |
| Abstract |
Dietary fluoride supplements were first introduced to provide systemic fluoride in areas where water fluoridation is not available. Since 1990, the use of fluoride supplements in caries prevention has been re-evaluated in several countries. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 364 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 7% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 19% |
| Unknown | 137 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 145 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 149 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,037,717
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,941
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,853
of 251,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.