↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) versus hospital or home haemodialysis for end-stage renal disease in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) versus hospital or home haemodialysis for end-stage renal disease in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003963.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke Vale, June D Cody, Sheila A Wallace, Conal Daly, Marion K Campbell, Adrian M Grant, Izhar Khan, Alison M MacLeod

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Psychology 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 22 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,611,299
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,107
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,596
of 283,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.