Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) versus hospital or home haemodialysis for end-stage renal disease in adults
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Luke Vale, June D Cody, Sheila A Wallace, Conal Daly, Marion K Campbell, Adrian M Grant, Izhar Khan, Alison M MacLeod
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||22||17%|
|Student > Bachelor||17||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||10||8%|
|Student > Postgraduate||9||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||47||36%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||18||14%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,178,331 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 64,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,178,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.