↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003511.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M Haas, Taylor J Hathaway, Patrick S Ramsey

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Other 16 9%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 49 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Psychology 11 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 55 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#449,301
of 24,503,201 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#814
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,098
of 350,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.