↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007161.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leandro Chambrone, Maria Aparecida Salinas Ortega, Flávia Sukekava, Roberto Rotundo, Zamira Kalemaj, Jacopo Buti, Giovan Paolo Pini Prato

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Postgraduate 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 53 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 59 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#897,969
of 19,441,086 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,181
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,445
of 289,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,441,086 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.