| Title |
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007161.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leandro Chambrone, Maria Aparecida Salinas Ortega, Flávia Sukekava, Roberto Rotundo, Zamira Kalemaj, Jacopo Buti, Giovan Paolo Pini Prato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 311 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 121 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 127 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,195,161
of 23,861,043 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,666
of 12,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,987
of 347,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,043 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.