↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012567.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joline F Roze, Jacob P Hoogendam, Fleur T van de Wetering, René Spijker, Leen Verleye, Joan Vlayen, Wouter B Veldhuis, Rob JPM Scholten, Ronald P Zweemer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 27 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,198,590
of 17,489,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,499
of 11,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,559
of 283,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,489,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.