↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004180.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Bunn, Geraldine Byrne, Sally Kendall

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 2%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 361 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 20%
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Other 32 8%
Other 83 22%
Unknown 67 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 16%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Psychology 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 84 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,129,345
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,590
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,055
of 53,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.