↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004180.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Bunn, Geraldine Byrne, Sally Kendall

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 325 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 22%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Other 29 8%
Other 72 21%
Unknown 47 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 15%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Psychology 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 64 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,976,412
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,626
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,157
of 375,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.