↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Naftopidil for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Naftopidil for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007360.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eu Chang Hwang, Shreyas Gandhi, Jae Hung Jung, Mari Imamura, Myung Ha Kim, Ran Pang, Philipp Dahm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 172 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Other 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 53 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 8%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 60 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,778,982
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,158
of 12,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,153
of 346,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.