↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010318.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenmi Liu, Jo C Dumville, Robert J Hinchliffe, Nicky Cullum, Fran Game, Nikki Stubbs, Michael Sweeting, Frank Peinemann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 362 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 17%
Student > Master 52 14%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 102 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 18%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 111 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#676,207
of 18,771,444 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,613
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,848
of 338,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,771,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.