↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
646 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010318.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenmi Liu, Jo C Dumville, Robert J Hinchliffe, Nicky Cullum, Fran Game, Nikki Stubbs, Michael Sweeting, Frank Peinemann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 646 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 646 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 12%
Student > Master 71 11%
Researcher 50 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 6%
Unspecified 37 6%
Other 137 21%
Unknown 234 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 167 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 15%
Unspecified 37 6%
Psychology 14 2%
Engineering 11 2%
Other 73 11%
Unknown 247 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,240,748
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,600
of 11,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,673
of 359,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.