↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004026.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Marshall, Ruth Crowther, William Hurt Sledge, John Rathbone, Karla Soares-Weiser

Abstract

Inpatient treatment is an expensive way of caring for people with acute psychiatric disorders. It has been proposed that many of those currently treated as inpatients could be cared for in acute psychiatric day hospitals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 30%
Psychology 37 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 41 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,082,312
of 16,027,561 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,942
of 11,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,375
of 221,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,027,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.