↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009431.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rapat Pittayanon, Yuhong Yuan, Natasha P Bollegala, Reena Khanna, Grigorios I Leontiadis, Paul Moayyedi

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Researcher 14 10%
Other 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 58 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 67 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,368,103
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,058
of 12,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,316
of 353,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.