↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003991.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynley A Cook, Huib AAM Van Vliet, Laureen M Lopez, Asha Pun, Maria F Gallo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 48 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 49 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,044,047
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,642
of 12,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,470
of 226,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.