↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003991.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynley A Cook, Huib AAM Van Vliet, Laureen M Lopez, Asha Pun, Maria F Gallo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 34 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 34 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,709,622
of 15,956,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,384
of 11,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,071
of 343,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,956,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.